Implications of Iran Secretly
Pursuing a Nuclear Weapons Program
If Iran were to secretly seek to
develop nuclear weapons while publicly denying such, then whenever that is
confirmed it would result in a devastating and irreparable loss of the regime’s
Islamic credentials. After all, the Qur’an has firmly commanded Muslims to
honor treaty obligations:
“O ye who believe! Fulfill (all) obligations (and this includes
treaty obligations)…”
Qur’an, al-Maidah, 5:1
Islamic Iran therefore has a religious
duty to honour its obligation under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty to refrain
from the development and acquisition of nuclear weapons. In addition to that
religious duty to negotiate in “good faith” and to honour treaty obligations, Iran’s leadership position
of the Shia Islamic world and its continuing
rivalry with Sunni Islam should be sufficient to convince the world that Shia Iran would never commit such an act of
religious suicide (i.e., violating its solemn treaty obligations).
The problem that we now face is that
today’s Judeo Christian Euro-world-order is incapable of trusting anyone at all.
They have established a record of deceit, cunning, double standards and lies in
the conduct of their affairs with the non European world. They have given their
word and then broken that word time and again. They have repudiated and
violated solemn treaty obligations time and again. They have planned and
executed terrorist attacks upon innocent people in many parts of the world,
including their own cities, and then blamed it on others in order to justify
war on Afghanistan, Iraq and Islam. The nuclear impasse with Iran, and the
dubious justification that it provides for war on that country, are obviously
deliberately and maliciously contrived.
The western world has established an
immoral norm in the ethics of warfare in which war can now be waged on the basis
of maliciously conceived presumption. This has truly ominous implications for
mankind. Only Gog, Magog, bandits and scoundrels wage wars of aggression based
on lies in order to seize other peoples’ oil and gas resources. Malcolm X would
have warned them that “chickens do come home to roost”.
Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) on
the other hand, set a lofty standard for the conduct of state in respect of the
ethics of war. His Sunnah, or example, is that war is waged only in response to aggression,
or in order to liberate the oppressed (on the condition that they, the
oppressed, themselves cry out for help to be liberated). The Qur’anic revelation
itself recognized that the blessed Prophet disliked war. But Allah Most High
warned that if some men did not stand up against the wickedness of others the
earth would be reduced to chaos and anarchy:
“By Allah’s will they routed them:
and David slew Goliath: and Allah gave him Power and Wisdom and taught him
whatever (else) He willed. And did not Allah check one set of people by means
of another (who would stand up to confront them), the earth would indeed be full
of mischief: but Allah is full of bounty to all the worlds.”
Qur’an, al-Baqarah, 2:251
The modern essentially godless western
man is incapable of conceiving that Iran can be speaking the truth in this matter,
and is acting in accordance with a moral standard which precludes the
possibility of any acquisition of nuclear weapons. Hence the West is preparing
the world for yet another Judeo-Christian war of aggression against a non European
Muslim people, waged on behalf of the Euro-Jewish State of Israel. The
Crusades, it would appear, would only end when Israel replaces USA as the
ruling state in the world, and the false Messiah (Anti-Christ) proclaims
himself to be the Messiah to the adoring applause of all those who now support Israel,
and who journey to Jerusalem to pay homage to her and to thus confirm that
support.
Let them know that the Qur’an has
declared that this world is a moral order in which the oppressor will one day come
face to face with the truly terrible consequences of his oppression. Muslims
are confident that the return of the true Messiah, Jesus the son of Mary (peace
and blessings of Allah Most High be upon them both) would result in the triumph
of Truth in Islam.
Who Will Attack Iran?
Even as the case for western war on
Iran is being built with the same lies, deception and fanatical resolve which
attended the commencement of the wars on Iraq and Afghanistan, it is quite clear
that a US President who faces increasing difficulties at home in defending an
unpopular war on Iraq cannot easily embark upon another war on Iran. There
would be serious political risks for him, and for his party, in such a
dangerous and misguided military adventure. Indeed, if USA launches war on
Iran, and occupies Iran’s oil belt, and this provokes an immensely strengthened
armed resistance to its occupation of Iraq, Afghanistan and Iran, President
Bush could be impeached.
If USA cannot lead the war on Iran then
it would be impossible for Britain to do so. Whether it is by design or by
chance, that leaves only one European nation capable of taking the lead in a war
on Iran, and that is the Euro-Jewish State of Israel.
Will It Be A Nuclear War?
Iran neither wants war with Israel, nor
is preparing to commence one. Iran would suffer immensely from war with Israel,
while Israel would hardly suffer any significant losses from a war for which
she is more than adequately prepared. Israel, also, would not want to wage such
war on any Muslim people at this time that would require Jewish invasion and occupation
of Muslim territory. Rather, the armies of the western world as well as their
client-state allies have been used as cannon-fodder for such ground combat.
Israel has been waging war on the
Palestinian people with awesome firepower from the air, as well as with small
fast moving commando teams infiltrating their territory in hit-and-run missions.
Israeli conventional wars have also been of very short duration (six days, for
example) so that they do not allow the Muslim world sufficient time to mobilize
for Jihad. If western troops hesitate to face the horrendously dangerous mission
of physically occupying Iran’s oil belt, then the alternative would have to be
a lightning aerial attack so powerful and destructive that it would pulverize
and incapacitate Iran. Only nuclear warfare can deliver such a result. We can
now understand the French President’s helping hand in preparing public opinion
to accept such an eventuality. He recently warned that France would not
hesitate to respond with nuclear weapons, if necessary, in the event that
France became the target of a terrorist attack.
The lightning Israeli attack on Iraq’s
Osiraq nuclear reactor in June 1981, shortly before the reactor was scheduled to
go into operation, resulted in its complete destruction. Yet Israel has not
faced any significant retaliation or suffered any loss at all from that blatant
act of aggression. US-led attacks on Iraq in 1991, and again ten years later,
made it impossible for that country to ever respond effectively to the Israeli aggression.
If Israel does attack Iran, its military
strategy would be to cripple that country and make it impossible for Iran to
mount an effective armed response. Israel would therefore expand her military
targets beyond the Iranian nuclear sites, and while it is certain that fighter
aircraft with guided missiles would be used to attack a host of targets
scattered all over Iran, it is likely that Israel would resort to use of
nuclear weapons.
Nuclear weapons could be used, for
example, to so destroy Iran’s oil and gas installations that it would be impossible
to restore the export of Iranian oil and gas for years to come. The consequence
for the Iranian economy, which is largely dependent on oil revenues, would be
disastrous. Indeed the economy would grind to a halt, and in the economic chaos
that would follow, it would be unthinkable for Iran to launch any kind of
conventional or nuclear war on Israel for many years to come.
Alternatively, Israel could seek to
seize Iran’s oil and gas in an attempt to control the world’s oil and gas
resources. A nuclear attack on Iran would result in a spectacular rise in the price
of oil and that, in turn, would permit Israel to hold the world to ransom for
oil while advancing her bid to establish Israeli rule over the whole world. For
that reason the use of nuclear weapons could be restricted to so incapacitating
Iran that it would be impossible for that country’s armed forces to defend the
oil-belt that the unholy triple alliance wants to seize.
