Sunday, 7 July 2024

PROFOUNDLY PRACTICAL AND RATIONAL RELIGION

  Quranic Foundations And Structure Of Muslim Society

 


PROFOUNDLY PRACTICAL AND RATIONAL:

“In all things Muhammad was profoundly practical, When his beloved son Ibrahim died, an eclipse occurred, and rumours of God’s personal condolence quickly arose. Whereupon Muhammad is said to have announced, ‘An eclipse is a phenomenon of nature. It is foolish to attribute such things to the death or birth of a human being’.”[1]

 

 

BROAD, LIBERAL AND UNIVERSALISTIC CREED FOR THE WHOLE WORLD:

“His creed … necessarily connotes the existence of a universal empire.”[2]

“The nobility and broad tolerance of this creed, which accepts as God-inspired all the real religions of the world, will always be a glorious heritage for mankind. On it could indeed be built a perfect world religion.”[3]

“More pure than the system of Zoroaster, more liberal than the law of Moses, the religion of Mahomet: might seem less inconsistent with reason than the creed of mystery and superstition which, in the seventh century, disgraced the simplicity of the gospels.”[4]

“Islam had the power of peacefully conquering souls by the simplicity of its theology, the clearness of its dogma and principles, and the definite number of the practices which it demands. In contrast to Christianity which has been undergoing continual transformation since its origin, Islam has remained identical with itself.”[5] 

“As a religion the Mahomedan religion, it must be confessed, is more suited to Africa than is the Christian religion: indeed, I would even say that it is more suited to the world as a whole [6] … the achievement of the Moslem faith enjoys, I maintain, a definite superiority, in proof of which may be cited Moslem abstinence, sense of fraternity, take condemnation of usury, and recognition of prophets other than its own. Its quality may be summed up by saying that it takes a man as he is, and while it does not pretend to make a god out of him, seeks to regulate his conduct so that at least he shall become a good neighbour.”[7]

 

 

WISEST, MOST LEARNED AND MOST ENLIGHTENED JURISPRUDENCE:

“The Muhammadan law which is binding on all from the  crowned head to the meanest subject is a law interwoven, with a system of the wisest, the most learned and the most enlightened jurisprudence that ever existed in the world.”[8]

 

 

NO COLOUR BAR:

“ ‘Take away that black man! I can have no discussion with him’, exclaimed the Christian Archbishop Cyrus when the Arab conquerors had sent a deputation of their ablest men to discuss terms of surrender of the capital of Egypt, headed by Negro Ubadah as the ablest of them all.

“To the sacred archbishop’s astonishment, he was told that this  man was commissioned by General Amr; that the Moslems held Negroes and white men in equal respect—judging a man by his character and not by his colour.

“ ‘Well, if the Negro must lead, he must speak gently’, ordered the prelate, so as not to frighten his white auditors.

“(Replied  Ubadah:) ‘There are a thousand blacks, as black as myself, amongst our companions. I and they would be ready to meet and fight a hundred enemies together. We live only to fight for God, and to follow His will. We care naught for wealth, so long as we have the wherewithal to stay our hunger and to clothe our bodies. This world is naught for us, the next world is all’.

“Such a spirit … can any other appeal stand against that of the Moslem who, in approaching the pagan, says to him, however obscure or degraded he may be, ‘Embrace the faith, and you are at once an equal and a brother’. Islam knows no ‘colour line’.”[9]  

 

 

RESTORATION OF DIGNITY OF WOMANHOOD:

“That his (Muhammad’s) reforms enhanced the status of women in general is universally admitted.”[10]

“You can find others stating that the religion (Islam) is evil, because it sanctions a limited polygamy. But you do not hear as a rule the criticism which I spoke out one day in a London hall where I knew that the audience was entirely uninstructed. I pointed out to them that monogamy with blended mass of prostitution was a hypocrisy and more degrading than a limited polygamy. Naturally a statement like that gives offence, but it has to be made, because it must be remembered that the law of Islam in relation to women was until lately, when parts of it have been imitated in England, the most just law, as far as women are concerned to be found in the world. Dealing with property, dealing with rights of succession and so on, dealing with cases of divorce, it was far beyond the law of the West, in the respect that was paid to the rights of women. Those things are forgotten while people are hypnotised by the words monogamy and polygamy and do not look at what lies behind it in the West—the frightful degradation of women who are thrown into the streets when their first protectors, weary of them, no longer give them any assistance …

“I often think that woman is more free in Islam than in Christianity. Woman is more protected by Islam than by the faith which preaches Monogamy. In Al-Quran the law about woman is more just and liberal. It is only in the last twenty years that Christian England has recognized the right of woman to property, while Islam has, allowed this right from all times … It is a slander to say that Islam preaches that women have no souls.”55

 

 

WAR AGAINST THE INSTITUTION OF SLAVERY:

“According to the Koran, no person can be made a slave except after the conclusion of a sanguinary battle fought in the conduct of a religious war (Jihad) in the country of infidels who try to suppress the true religion. Indeed, wherever the word slave occurs in Koran it is ‘he

                                                 

55 Annie Besant: The Life and Teaching of Muhammad, Madras 1932, pp, 25-26

 

whom your right hand possesses’, or a special equivalent for neck— ‘he whose neck has been spared’, thus clearly indicating ‘a prisoner of war’ made by the action of not one man only, but of many … the Arabian prophet recommended: ‘When the war has ended, restore them (the slaves or prisoners) to liberty or give them up for ransom’ (Sura 47:57) …

“And elsewhere: ‘Alms (which procure righteousness) are distined … to the redemption of slaves’ (Sura 9:60). Further (Sura 24:33): ‘If any of your slaves asks for his manumission in writing give it to him, if you think him worthy of it, and give him also some of the wealth which God has given you’ … The reconciliation of a separated married couple should be preceded by the ransom of a slave, and, if none can be found, the husband should feed sixty poor, or else fast for two months (Sura 58:4-5). Whenever the sense of happiness, including that of conjugal felicity, predisposes the heart to gratitude towards the Creator, or whenever fear of God or a punishment, or the desire of a blessing, affect, as such motives can and do affect the daily life of a Mohammadan, the emancipation of a slave, as a most proper act of charity is recommended. In short, the ‘Cliff’, or narrow path to salvation, is charity: ‘What is the cliff ? It is to free the captive (or slave)’ Sura 90:12-13).

“Descending to the second source of the Mohammadan Law, the authenticated traditions of Hadis, we find Mohammad stating that ‘the worst of men is he who sells men’: slaves who displeased their masters were to be forgiven ‘seventy times a day’: no believer can be made a slave; and ‘in proportion to the number of redeemed slaves will members of the body of the releasing person be rescued from the (eternal) fire’.”[11]



[1] Ibid.

[2] Joseph J. Nunan: Islam and  European Chivilizaion, Demerara 1912, p. 37.

[3] Duncan Greenless: The Gospel of Islam, Adyar 1948, p. 27.

[4] Edward Gibbon: The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, Vol. 5, p. 487.

[5] Jean L’heureux, Etude sur L’Islamisme. p. 35.

[6] Italics are the present writer’s

[7] Lancelot Lawton: The Sphere, London, 12th May, 1928.

[8] Edmund Burke: in his “Impeachment of Warren Hastings”.

[9] S. S. Leeder: Veiled Mysteries of Egypt, London 1912, pp 332-335.

[10] H.A.R. Gibb: Mohammedanism, London 1953. p. 33.

[11] Dr. G. W. Leitner; Mohammadanism, pp. 17-18. Cf. the observation: “It is indeed an ‘abuse of words’ to apply the word slavery in the English sense to any status known to the legislation of Islam.” (Syed Amir Ali : The Spirit of Islam; p. 262). 

Source

to be continued . . . . .



No comments:

Post a Comment