Friday 30 September 2016

The Phenomenon - DREAMS IN ISLAM


The phenomenon of true dreams should have presented the Muslim, on the other hand, with a heaven-sent opportunity for demonstrating the validity of Islam’s spiritual interpretation of reality, of the universe and of human nature.  Yet, apart from the rare authentic and erudite Sufi master, of the likes of Dr. Muhammad Iqbal, Muslim scholars living in this modern age of the ascendancy of the West have not produced, from an Islamic psychological perspective, any theoretical work on the phenomenon of dreams. Work is being done by scholars trained in western psychology (i.e., psychology as a discipline which was developed in western secular materialist civilization), but because they are operating in a completely secular scientific framework they suffer from significant limitations and handicaps.  

We wish to pose the question: Why has this great opportunity for using true dreams as a means of demolishing the western epistemology been missed by Islamic scholarship and by the so called great contemporary Islamic reform movements? Iqbal has observed that religious thought  in Islam has been practically stationary during the last five hundred years.1
This is a statement that should truly alarm Muslims and jolt their minds to enquiring for the cause of this intellectual lethargy in our religious thought. Our view is that a scientific and ‘Protestant’ version of Islam emerged as a consequence of the intellectual impact of the western colonial rule over Muslims.  That scientific ‘Protestant’ version of Islam was the child of the very western epistemology which was essentially directed towards negating the possibility or validity of knowledge from any source which transcends scientific observation. 

Islamic Protestantism emerged in Saudi Arabia in the form of the Wahhabi movement and proceeded to launch a fierce and relentless attack on Sufism.  It was quite clear that authentic Sufism had lost its intellectual dynamism and creativity and, like everything else in Islamic civilization, was in a state of drift.  Iqbal took note of that failure in a scathing passage in his famous work from which we have been quoting:

The technique of medieval mysticism by which religious life, in its higher manifestations, developed itself both in the East and in the West, has now practically failed.  And in the Muslim East it has, perhaps, done far greater havoc than anywhere else.  Far from reintegrating the forces of the average man’s inner life, and thus preparing him for participation in the march of history, it has taught him a false renunciation and made him perfectly contented with his ignorance and spiritual thralldom.2

The enlightened student of Iqbal, (Maulana) Dr. F. R. Ansari, also points to degeneration in Sufism, but warns against throwing away the baby with the bath-water:

With the awful degeneration of Muslim society, due to certain historical factors well-known to students of Islamic history, the understanding as well as the practice of tasawwuf also has degenerated in more dimensions than one.  Also its name has been misused for certain wrong notions and ideas in certain quarters.  In spite of that, however, the denial to the Islamic religious quest (i.e., tasawwuf) of its rightful place amounts to the very negation of Islam.  Also, interpreting tasawwuf in terms of mysticism projected by other religions is a flagrant violation of Truth.3
  
Sufism suffered the fate of being high-jacked by professional opportunists who perfected the art of psychological suggestion to introduce variant practices through which they established veritable spiritual serfdom's. But in the process of purging Islamic beliefs and practices of all that was perceived as Sufi bid’ah (innovations), the scientific ‘Protestant’ Islamic movement acted as a Trojan horse within the body of Islam allowing the western epistemology to secularize Islam. 
The ‘baby’ was thrown out with the ‘bath water’!  That secularized version of Islam was then declared to be Islamic revivalism. The so-called great Islamic reform movements proceeded to establish centers of learning and to produce large numbers of scholars who were intellectually incapable of dealing with the subject of dreams.  Worse than that, their zealotry and misguided attack on authentic Sufism resulted in such inner damage to their own spiritual personalities that they themselves were now rendered incapable of themselves being blessed by Allah Most High with continuous good and true dreams. 

But long before the modern materialist West impacted on religious thought by secularizing it, the world of Islam had experienced the same phenomenon in the emergence of the Mu’atazilite school of religious thought in Islam.  Iqbal described that event:

The Mu’atazilah, conceiving religion merely as a body of religious doctrines and ignoring it as a vital fact, took no notice of non-conceptual modes of approaching Reality and reduced religion to a mere system of logical concepts ending in a purely negative attitude.  They failed to see that in the domain of knowledge - scientific or religious - complete independence of thought from concrete experience is not possible.”     (Iqbal is here referring to religious experience, among other things, and religious experience includes true dreams). 4

It was the genius of Dr. Muhammad Iqbal that he was able to distinguish authentic Sufism from its corruptions, and restore authentic Sufism.  It was his genius that he succeeded in articulating the Sufi epistemology in a manner which demolished the considerable objections of the scientific, ‘Protestant’, secularly educated intelligentsia in the modern West as well as in the Muslim world.  Had Dr. Muhammad Iqbal studied Islam at Al-Azhar University in Egypt or at the Deoband and Lucknow Islamic seminaries in India, he would never have emerged as the great scholar and sage that he was.  And the reason for this was not limited to his own natural talent but also to the epistemology which he inherited from authentic Sufism, - an epistemology which scientific ‘Protestant’ Islam could never deliver.  

Secular Europe’s scientific method differed from the scientific method that reached Europe from Muslim Spain. What post-Christian secular Europe did was to establish a new dogmatic religion that claimed that only that which could be observed could be the subject of a scientific enquiry.  The new dogmatic religion thus fostered habits of concrete thought that mitigated against the very substance and life-blood of religion, i.e., religious experience.  Europe proceeded to establish a basic dogma, i.e., the audacious claim that only ‘scientific’ knowledge was ‘real’ knowledge, - all else belonged to Disneyland.  And so, the modern religious mind in Europe slowly closed its doors to ‘religious experience’ and to the study of such phenomena.  The true dream is a religious experience.  William James has done an extreme useful service to religious thought in producing his classical work: ‘Varieties of Religious Experience’, in which the true dream has a pride of place.

What possible scientific method could there be for examining the phenomenon of a true dream? Here, for example, is what a true dream can be:

Last night I dreamt that my neighbor’s house was on fire.  This morning it was burnt down.

This experience of a true dream cannot possibly be the subject of a scientific enquiry because secular western psychology, operating with the new scientific method, cannot transcend observable phenomena.  Freud was the perfected product of the new scientific thinking and, as a consequence, was theoretically incapable of dealing with the phenomenon of true dreams.

It is precisely because of the great danger posed by the new western epistemology and the scientific religion which emerges from that epistemology that Iqbal began his great work, ‘The Reconstruction of Religious Thought in Islam with two very powerfully written chapters on ‘Knowledge and Religious Experience’ and ‘The Philosophical Test of the Revelations of Religious Experience’. He followed them up with another later chapter entitled: ‘Is Religion Possible?’

Iqbal made a valiant effort to respond to the challenge posed by scientific ‘Protestant’ Islam in its rejection of religious experience as a source of knowledge.  He began his work by addressing the subject in the Preface of the book itself.  We quote him at length so that the reader who is unfamiliar with his thought, or hitherto incapable of understanding him, may now be encouraged to study his great work:

The Qur’an is a book which emphasizes ‘deed’ rather than ‘idea’.  There are, however, men to whom it is not possible organically to assimilate an alien universe by re-living, as a vital process, that special type of inner experience on which religious faith ultimately rests. Moreover, modern man, by developing habits of concrete thought - habits which Islam itself fostered at least in the earlier stages of its cultural career - has rendered himself less capable of that experience which he further suspects because of its liability to illusion.   

The more genuine schools of Sufism have, no doubt, done good work in shaping and directing the evolution of religious experience in Islam; but their latter-day representatives, owing to their ignorance of the modern mind, have become absolutely incapable of receiving any fresh inspiration from modern thought and experience.  They are perpetuating methods which were created for generations possessing a cultural outlook differing, in many important respects, from our own.  ‘Your creation and your resurrection,’ says the Qur’an, ‘are like the creation and resurrection of a single soul.’  A living experience of the kind of biological unity embodied in this verse requires today a method physiologically less violent and psychologically more suitable to a concrete type of mind.  In the absence of such a method the demand for a scientific form of religious knowledge is only natural. 5     

If ever there was a impregnable defense of the Sufi epistemology articulated in the idiom of modern thought, Iqbal accomplished it.  The tragedy since 1938, when Iqbal’s work was published, is that contemporary Islamic scholarship which has emerged from the scientific ‘Protestant’ version of Islam has been intellectually incapable of even understanding these three chapters of Iqbal’s great work. 

Dreams are part of a larger whole that may be described as intuitive experience.  Today’s scientific religion has pitted ‘reason’ or ‘thought’ against ‘intuition’ and depicted them as opposites.  This is the reason why the modern secularly educated mind either ignores dreams, being incapable of rationally assimilating such a source of knowledge and experience, or reluctantly admits them but with an apologetic admission of a flirtation with supernatural superstition.  Iqbal took up the challenge and argued the case for the epistemological validity of ‘intuitive’ knowledge and experience.  He declared:

. . . Nor is there any reason to suppose that thought and intuition are essentially opposed to each other.  They spring up from the same root and complement each other.  The one grasps Reality piecemeal, the other grasps it in its wholeness.  The one fixes its gaze on the eternal, the other on the temporal aspect of reality.  The one is present enjoyment of the whole of Reality; the other aims at traversing the whole by slowly specifying and closing up the various regions of the whole for exclusive observation.  Both are in need of each other for mutual rejuvenation.  Both seek visions of the same Reality which reveals itself to them in accordance with their function in life.  In fact, intuition, as Bergson rightly says, is only a higher kind of intellect.6

It should also be a matter of great significance to our skeptical readers that the Qur’an itself has chosen to commence its guidance to humanity by insisting, at the very beginning, (Qur’an, al Baqarah,2:1) that religious faith is essentially constructed on belief in that which lies beyond our normal observation, - i.e., beyond the world of concrete thought  (al-ghaib)! True dreams belong to that world.  Indeed the most profound experience in the life of the Prophet Muhammad sallalahu ‘alaihi wa sallam was a nocturnal journey (not a dream) into that unseen world, - a journey on which he was taken in order that he might have direct experience of the transcendental world. Thus the Qur’an declares:

He surely saw the greatest of the Signs of his Lord.” 
(Qur’an: al-Najm:- 53:18) 
                                                                           
Knowledge must be de-secularized if religious Truth is to be allowed to play the role which only Truth can play.  That role is one of  restoring human society to the beliefs and values of authentic religion which alone can anchor mankind in a life of peace, happiness, fulfillment and success. In order for knowledge to be desecularized we need to demonstrate that knowledge can come, and has come, from a transcendental source, - a source which transcends normal experience. Only when knowledge has been desecularized can the modern mind apply itself seriously to restoring the life of the sacred.  The late outstanding Islamic scholar, Ismail Faruqi (ra), was attempting to do precisely that, i.e., to desecularize knowledge.  Unfortunately he coined the term ‘Islamization of Knowledge’ and in doing so the essential goal of desecularizing knowledge was obscured and eventually lost by those who inherited his noble mission in the cause of Truth.

A serious study on the phenomenon of dreams by an erudite Muslim psychologist can make a significant contribution towards de-secularizing knowledge and redirecting thought to the recognition of the primacy of the sacred, and to the understanding of the essential harmony in the relationship between ‘material’ form and ‘spiritual’ substance in the external universe and the human phenomenon.  Islamic scholarship of the quality and caliber of Dr. Muhammad Iqbal is required for undertaking such a study that we describe as: The Metaphysics of the True Dream.

It is our hope that this booklet will provoke Muslim psychologists who have a profound interest in Islam learning, to devote more thought and attention to the subject, and to direct their intellectual and spiritual energy towards pursuing that strategic goal which we have described.


Friday 23 September 2016

Introduction - DREAMS IN ISLAM



DREAMS IN ISLAM

Introduction

When you smile,
You do not smile alone,
For the flowers in the fields are always smiling!

And when you sing,
You do not sing alone,
For the birds, and the river, and the rain, and the wind, also sing!

And when you laugh,
You do not laugh alone,
For are’nt the children always laughing?

But when you weep,
With a weeping beyond tears;
When the heart weeps,
It weeps alone!”

I have chosen to introduce the subject of ‘Dreams in Islam’ with this poem that I wrote many moons ago, because it clearly depicts the heart as something that not only ‘sees’, and ‘feels’, and ‘knows’, but does so in a manner which is more profound than all our other experiences.  Dreams belong to the heart.  Tell me your dreams, and I will tell  you who you are. 

In addressing the subject of dreams we are, in fact, studying the heart and, as a consequence we are probing into the very depths of human nature and conduct.  Some dreams are divine gifts to the heart, and such gifts come only when the heart is sound, healthy, innocent, and penetrated with faith in Allah Most High.  Other dreams represent attacks on the heart.  And still other dreams are either medicine for the heart, or windows to the heart that allow us to see our own hearts.

 The Qur’an informs us that Allah Most High punishes the disbelievers by sealing their ‘hearts’, and their ‘hearing’, and by placing veils before their ‘eyes’.  (Qur’an, al-Baqara, 2:7).  As a consequence such people cannot ‘see’!

We live, today, in a world in which the overwhelming majority of mankind, including some Muslims cannot ‘see’.  The only time a believer can be certain that he can ‘see’ is when he sees in dreams!  But most people no longer understand this.

A Muslim brother who is actively engaged in the mission of Islam in the islands of the Caribbean once wrote to me to advise that a Muslim should not attach any importance to dreams. So opposed was he to the subject that he felt that attaching importance to dreams was a form of Shirk (i.e., a form of compromise in the exclusive worship of the One God, Allah). Instead of being deviated by dreams, he advised, one should devote one’s attention to direct contact with Allah Most High.

In fact the religious mind which produced that kind of opinion is new to this ummah (religious community) and has emerged as a consequence of the impact of the secularization of thought and knowledge by today’s dominant western materialist civilization. That secularism, which led to materialism, and which sometimes emerges in the form of a new godless religion called humanism,  seeks support from science and rationalism, and is distinctly uncomfortable with all that relates to transcendental experience.  The true dream is most certainly a transcendental experience!  It is by design, and not by accident, that the modern godless age has relegated the phenomenon of true dreams to academic and intellectual obscurity.  This is because the true dream cannot be explained using a new Western epistemology that is essentially directed towards negating the possibility or validity of knowledge from any source that transcends scientific observation.

Friday 16 September 2016

Preface - DREAMS IN ISLAM


PREFACE

This book on the subject, Dreams in Islam’, is published in the Ansari Memorial Series in honor of my teacher and Shaikh of blessed memory, Maulana Dr. Muhammad Fadlur Rahman Ansari Al-Qaderi (1914-1974).  Had we not acquired the authentic Sufi epistemology from that great teacher at the Aleemiyah Institute of Islamic Studies in Karachi, Pakistan, we could not have written this book. Let me at the very outset hasten to make an important distinction, which Iqbal also made, between authentic Sufism and the many forms of pseudo-Sufism that have lately emerged.  In all our references in this book to Sufism we identify with the Sufism of men like Ghous al-‘Azam, Shaikh ‘Abd al-Qadir al-Jilani, Maulana Jalaluddin Rumi (who was Iqbal’s mentor), Shaikh al-Akbar, Muhiuddin Ibn ‘Arabi, Imam al Ghazzali, Imam Ibn Taimiyyah and others.

‘Dreams in Islam’ is a subject whose supreme importance for the believer continues to increase as the world becomes increasingly godless and as the historical process draws to a close. The Prophet sallalahu ‘alaihi wa sallam  said:

“When the time (of the end of the world) draws close, the dreams of a believer will hardly fail to come true, and a dream of a believer is one of the forty-six parts of prophethood.”
(Bukhari)

We pray that Allah (st) may make it possible for a Muslim psychologist of the caliber and competence of my dear friend, Dr. Malik Badri, to write a comprehensive work on the subject in the English language at some time in the future Insha Allah.  (Cf. his masterly work entitled, ‘The Dilemma of the Muslim Psychologist’).  If a comprehensive work on Dreams in Islam were to be written now it would, I believe, be the first work on the subject ever to be written in the English language. 

One of the signs of the last age, i.e., before the end of the world, is the absence of knowledge (of Truth and, therefore of Islam).  Our widespread ignorance of the subject of ‘Dreams’ and the important place which ‘Dreams’ occupy in Islam, (as well as the widespread ignorance of the subject of the Prohibition of Riba in Islam), is yet another indication that the last age has arrived!  I was myself largely ignorant of the subject and, as a consequence, Satan attacked me through dreams for ten long miserable years.  I did not have the basic knowledge of the subject that the reader can now easily obtain by reading this booklet, and which could have protected me from those dangerous attacks and from the grievous damage that they inflicted on me and my family.

Dreams are sometimes classified as of three kinds, ‘good and true’ dreams - which come from Allah (st), ‘evil’ dreams or ‘nightmares’ - which come from Satan, and dreams that emanate from our own ‘self’. The minimum knowledge of the subject which every believer should have is the knowledge with which to be able to classify his or her own dreams and thus to be able to recognize a dream which has come from Satan.  That is indispensable since protective action from such a dream must be taken immediately after one wakes from sleep.

When the same dream has been repeated at different places in the text it is because the dream has a multidimensional application.

There are many who will read this booklet and who can add to its importance by allowing us to include in a future edition some of the important dreams that they have had. There may even be a reader or two who has been blessed by Allah (st) with the capacity to interpret dreams.  Some thirty years ago I dreamt Maulana Jalaluddin Rumi lifting me in his arms and taking me up into the sky.  It was surely a good dream. And it may be that someone who reads this book may be able to interpret that dream for me.

This book was written at great speed because of time constraints.  I did not have the time to devote to the study and analysis of the dreams that the Prophet sallalahu ‘alaihi wa sallam  and his companions saw.  And that was such a great pity.  Basit Bilal Koshul was the only one close to me to whom I could turn for a critical review of the MS, and he kindly put aside his doctoral research work to respond to my call. The brothers, Shaheed and Husman Bacchus, also assisted in proof-reading. May Allah bless them.  Ameen.

I pray to Allah (st) to bless this humble effort in the cause of Truth and forgive me my sins.  And I pray that this booklet may be of benefit to the reader and may make such a positive contribution to his/`her inner purification and growth that he/she may be blessed with a nur (light) with which to see and recognize the godless world which is today all around us, and the ‘dregs’ of humanity which today control it. 

Ameen!

 INH
Masjid Darul Qur’an,Long Island, New York. USA.
Muharram 1418May 1997

PS
At the funeral of my beloved friend and brother, Shaikh Alphahim  Job, which took place on Saturday May 31, 1997 in New York, two extraordinary dreams were related to me.  I interrupted the printing of this book so that they could also be included.  Those dreams are to be found on pages ..........



End. Notes - Bibliography

  • 1. Muhammad Iqbal: ‘Reconstruction of Religious Thought in Islam’.  Lahore. Institute of Islamic Culture. 1986.  p. 6.
  • 2.  Iqbal. Op.cit. p. 148-9.
  • 3. Ansari: The Quranic Foundations and Structure of Muslim Society.  World Federation of Islamic Missions. Karachi.  Vol. 1. p. 152 fn
  • 4.  Iqbal. Op. Cit. p.4.
  • 5.  Iqbal. Op. Cit. p.v
  • 6.  Iqbal.  Op. Cit. p. 2   
  • 7. Ibn Ishaq: Sirat Rasool Allah translated into English  by A. Guillaume as  ‘The Life of Muhammad’.  Oxford Univ. Press. Karachi. 1967.   pp 45,  62-4.  
  • 8.         Ibn Ishaq, Op. Cit.; p. 9 and Ibn Sa’ad: Kitab al-Tabaqat al-Kabir. Translated into English by S. Moinul Haq.  Kitab Bhawan. New Delhi. No  date.  p. 106
  • 9.   Ibn Ishaq. Op. Cit.; p. 69
  • 10.   Ibn Ishaq. Op. Cit.; pp. 79-80
  • 11.   Safwat al-Tafaseer, Vol. 1, p. 589              
  • 12.    Imam Malick: Muwatta.  Kitab al-Jaami. Ch. 553
  • 13. Muhammad Asad, The Message of the Qur’an. Dar al-Andalus. Gibraltar.  1980. Fn. 9 to Ch. 12 verse 5 of his translation and commentary of the  Qur’an.
  • 14. See section: ‘How to respond if anyone says that he has seen a Dream’.
  • 15. Asad. Op. Cit.; Note 49 to Ch. 8 verse 44.
  • 16.   Martin Lings: ‘Muhammad - his life based on earliest sources’. George  Allen and Unwin. 1983.  p. 247
  • 17. Ibn Ishaq. Op. Cit.;  p.500
  • 18.   Cf. the writer’s ‘Diplomacy in Islam - an Analysis of the Treaty of  Hudaibiyah’.
  • 19. Ibn Sa’ad, Op. Cit.;  p. 224
  • 20.   Ibn Ishaq. Op. Cit.; pp. 235-6
  • 21. Akili, ‘Ibn Seerin’s Dictionary of Dreams’. Pearl Publishing House.   Philadelphia. 1992.  p.xix     
  • 22. Iqbal: Op. Cit. p. 7.
  • 23. Iqbal.  Op. Cit. pp. 12-3  
  • 24. Ansari. Op. Cit. Vol. 1. p. 93.   
  • 25.  Iqbal: Op. Cit. p. 5.
  • 26. Ansari. Op. Cit. P. 153-4....
  • 27.      Nabulisi, Ta’teer al-Anaam fi tafseer al-Ahlaam. Muqaddama. p. 3
  • 28. Akili, Op. Cit.;  p.xix
  • 29.  Akili. Op. Cit.; p. xxv
  • 30.  Akili. Op. Cit.;  p. xxix
  • 31. Akili. Op. Cit.;  p. xx
  • 32. Akili. Op. Cit.;  p. xxiv