Friday 28 July 2017

Israel’s Piracy – Gaza’s Starvation and our Berlin Walls



Israel’s Piracy:
Gaza’s Starvation And Our Berlin Walls

This essay, as well as the one which follows, were written in late 2009 in the aftermath of Israel’s barbarous attack on Gaza.
Freedom Flotilla leaving Turkey
A humanitarian convoy of ships carrying thousands of tons of supplies and hundreds of politicians, activists and journalists was attacked last night by the Israeli Armed Forces in a carefully calculated air and sea assault while the ships (some carrying Turkish flags) were still in international waters. The Flotilla was seeking to break Israel’s three-year-long blockade of Gaza in order to deliver basic necessities such as food and medicine to the impoverished Palestinians living in the coastal enclave. Israeli forces raided the Freedom Flotilla, killing at least 20 people. 

It was not by accident that most of those killed and injured were Turkish nationals who were aboard ships flying Turkish flags. I fear that Israel’s coldly calculated attack of criminal ‘piracy’ is meant to provoke Turkey’s pro-Islamic government to respond in a way that Israel could then exploit to initiate the big war that has long been planned. 

The back-up plan may be to initiate a limited war that could provoke a military coup d’état and regime change in Turkey. The largely secular Turkish military which has remained firmly supportive of Israel will certainly be complicit in such a back-up plan.  

Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan has already described the Israeli attack as “inhuman state terror” and “the trampling underfoot of international law” and has vowed a proper response. “We will not stay silent and unresponsive in the face of this,” he was quoted as saying.  He could say nothing less since the rage of the Turkish Muslim people seems to have risen higher than ever before. 

How should Muslims respond to this latest act of manifest Israeli provocation

Muslims around the world must first make the case that mankind should not and cannot condone Israel’s starvation of an entire civilian population in Gaza and the unjust killing of innocent people in international waters as morally acceptable conduct of a State in the modern age. 

They should then launch a do-or-die struggle to rid themselves of the pro-Israeli Egyptian, Saudi, Pakistani (and other) governments and Armed Forces that control the world of Islam on behalf of the enemies of Islam and of mankind. The way these governments respond to Israel’s latest attack will expose the kind of response we can expect from them as events continue to mysteriously unfold leading quite predictably to the world-war that Israel desperately wants to provoke. 

Such governments and Armed Forces in the Muslim world must not be allowed to continue their dirty work on Israel’s behalf. They have built their own Berlin Walls to protect themselves from their own people. They have sponsored their own so-called experts to hoodwink and deceive the Muslim masses into embracing them as champions of Islam who, with help from Disneyland, will soon conquer India. 

Unless and until those neo- Berlin Walls protecting the Egyptian, Saudi and Pakistani governments and Armed Forces are demolished, the ropes around the necks of Muslims will continue to become tighter and yet tighter.


To be Continued....

Friday 21 July 2017

Attack On Iran Can Destabilize Pakistan’s Pro-Israeli Regime



Attack On Iran Can Destabilize Pakistan’s Pro-Israeli Regime

An Israeli attack on Iran can result in even more ominous consequences for the Euro-Jewish State since it could provoke an already agitated Muslim people in Pakistan to such a boiling-point of resentment and anger as to threaten the very survival of the pro-American and pro-Israeli Musharraf regime in Pakistan. Many Pakistanis already despise that regime.  

If the present client-regime in Pakistan were to be replaced through a military coup, or a bloody insurrection, by a leader with credentials of opposition to American and Israeli oppression and aggression against Muslims, Israel would certainly reverse her current ‘blind-eye’ towards Pakistan’s nuclear-weapons capability and argue that those weapons pose a threat to her very survival. The world would then witness yet another Judeo-Christian Euro-crusade against a non-European Muslim people.  

Already it is clear that Muslim public opinion around the world is firmly in favor of such leaders who can resist western and Israeli oppression and their dirty war on Islam. It was because an opportunity presented itself for such that the last presidential election in Iran resulted in a maverick and diplomatically immature but anti-American and anti-Israeli Mayor of Teheran soundly defeating ex-President Rafsanjani who was mature and diplomatically astute but whose credentials of standing up to the oppressor were less than impressive.  

It was again precisely such an opportunity that explains the electoral victory of the Palestinian Hamas Islamic resistance movement that has courageously resisted Israeli oppression, over a secular Fatah with a tarnished record in the occupied Holy Land. Indeed a western attack on Iran would almost certainly inflame Muslim public opinion around the world to such an extent that at least some pro-American leaders and regimes in the Muslim world will fall. Such a development would be a tremendous loss of face for the US administration.

Attack On Iran Would Cause a Dramatic Rise In Price Of Both Oil And Gold With Ominous Implications For The Us Dollar

It is certain that an attack on Iran would result in an instantaneous and dramatic rise in oil prices as well as the price of gold. Few people seem to realize that when the price of gold ‘goes up’ it actually amounts to the value of the US dollar ‘going down. In September 1971 the US government, having solemnly pledged its word, reneged and scrapped the Breton Woods Accord. Britain had acted in September 1971 in accordance with her rights under the Breton Woods Accord in demanding that the US government redeem for gold (at $35 per ounce of gold) a few billion dollars of British-held US dollars. USA was legally obliged to do so under international law, but did not have the gold to redeem all the dollars it had printed and put in circulation both domestically and overseas. That was fraudulent. It could have led to war. But all that happened was that US simply broke her word, reneged from her treaty obligations and scrapped the Breton Woods Accord.  

The value of the US dollar has been generally based since then on market demand around the world. Specifically, however, the US dollar has kept its strength because of imperial America’s control over its oil-exporting client-states, insisting that the dollar must be the currency used for the purchase of oil.  

 USA was devious enough to get the world to accept that it could take any amount of paper and make money with it, and so long as mankind accepted that paper-money, and there was demand for it, USA did not have to worry about where it would find the money to pay for imports, goods, services, etc. It would simply print the paper. But USA ensured that there would be a substantial and significant demand for US paper dollars by imposing upon oil exporting countries the obligation to sell their oil for that US paper-money. The result was that the demand for US dollars remained forever strong, indeed stronger by far than the demand for any other paper money.  

But war on Iran would certainly disrupt oil and gas exports from that country and could, conceivably, also result in a shutdown of the strategic Straits of Hormuz through which tankers laden with Gulf oil must pass to get to the open seas.

If Europe does not act wisely with the Iranian nuclear portfolio and it is referred to the U.N. Security Council and economic or air travel restrictions are imposed unjustly, we have the power to halt oil supply to the last drop from the shores of the Persian Gulf via the Straits of Hormuz,” said Mohammed-Nabi Rudaki, deputy chairman of the Iranian parliament’s National Security and Foreign Policy Commission.  

Twenty-five to forty percent of the world’s oil trade passes through the Straits of Hormuz, which connects the Persian Gulf to the Indian Ocean. If Iran were to carry out such a threat, other big oil producers in the region, such as the United Arab Emirates and Kuwait, would be unable to export oil to Japan, China and the rest of the world.  

Oil prices could conceivably increase to $200 a barrel or more, and as the price of gold also escalates as it did in January 1980 ($850 an oz.) the US dollar would so lose value as to become a very significant liability. If some Central Banks and large corporations respond to the falling value of the dollar by turning away from the US dollar in search of a more stable currency which could store value with greater reliability, and if the proposed Iranian oil bourse succeeds in offering an alternative to the dollar for the purchase of oil, this would have disastrous consequences for the dollar. If the US dollar loses its present status as the international currency, such a collapse would bring down with it all the paper money in the world. It would also mark the end of the era of American dominance over the rest of the world as the ruling state. Such would be an entirely positive development for an Israel that is just biding its time to replace USA as the third and last ruling state in history. 


Israeli Attack On Iran Would Be A Stab In The Back For U.S Forces In Iraq And Afghanistan But Would Result In Unprecedented Opportunity For Israel

An Israeli attack on Iran and a western occupation of Iran’s oil belt would provoke an instantaneous and dramatic increase in the size and power of the armed Muslim resistance to US occupation of Iraq and Afghanistan. Even more ominously, both Sunni and Shia Muslims would now jointly wage the armed struggle to liberate these territories from US occupation. Anti-war public opinion in USA would force a repetition of the US withdrawal from Vietnam. In addition US troops in places such as Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Turkey and so many other Muslim countries would either have to withdraw or go into hiding. This would imply both military and political disaster for USA and would precipitate her rapid decline as the ruling state in the world. A nuclear attack on Iran would also expose US troops in Iraq to dangerous nuclear radio-active fallout.  

But it would also present to the world a carefully engineered spectacle of an Israel bereft of US protective security, hemmed in by the so-called rising tide of militant Islam, and threatened with destruction. Thus the necessary conditions would have been cleverly and deliberately created for Israel to claim a causus bellum that would justify a war that would deliver, in turn, a dramatic territorial expansion (“from the river of Egypt to the great river – the river Euphrates”). Israel would seize control of the Suez Canal as well as all the oil and gas resources in the Persian Gulf while finally embracing the Biblical frontiers of Holy Israel.  

In conclusion, this is no conspiracy theory but, rather, the truth about a plan that continues to be confirmed as events unfold in the world. Nor is this essay anti-Jewish. There are Jews who oppose the wickedness of the Euro-Jewish State of Israel. There are Jews who found refuge and security in the Muslim world and lived peacefully with Muslims with honor, respect and religious freedom for more than a thousand years until they were deceived into leaving their homeland and to take up residence in the imposter State of Israel. There are Jews who do not wage war on Islam, nor support those who do so. Not only can such Jews be friends of Muslims, they can also be our allies.

To be Continued....