Quranic Foundations And Structure Of Muslim Society
GENUINENESS OF FAITH IN HIS
DIVINE MISSION:
“The essential
sincerity of Muhammad’s nature cannot be questioned: and an historical
criticism that blinks no fact, yields nothing to credulity, weighs every
testimony, has no partisan interest, and seeks only the truth, must acknowledge
his claim to belong to that order of prophets who, whatever the nature of their
physical experience may have been, in diverse times, in diverse manners, have
admonished, taught and uttered austere and sublime thoughts, laid down
principles of conduct nobler than those they found, and devoted themselves
fearlessly to their high calling, being irresistibly impelled to their ministry
by a power within.”[1]
“His readiness to undergo persecutions for his beliefs, the
high moral character of the men who believed in him and looked up to him as
leader, and the greatness of his ultimate achievement—all argue his fundamental
integrity. To suppose Muhammad as impostor raises more problems than it solves.
Moreover, none of the great figures of history is so poorly appreciated in the
West as Muhammad … Thus, not merely must we credit Muhammad with essential
honesty and integrity of purpose, if we are to understand him at all; if we are
to correct the errors we have inherited from the past, we must in every
particular case hold firmly to the belief in his sincerity until the opposite
is conclusively proved; and we must not forget that conclusive proof is a much
stricter requirement than a show of plausibility, and in a matter such as this
only to be attained with difficulty.”[2]
A GREAT EXEMPLAR:
“Serious or trivial, his daily behaviour has instituted a
canon which millions observe at this day with conscious memory. No one regarded
by any section of the human race as Perfect Man has been imitated so minutely.
The conduct of the Founder of Christianity has not so governed the ordinary
life of his followers. Moreover, no founder of a religion has been left on so
solitary an eminence as the Muslim Apostle.”[3]
PERMANENT IMPACT OF REVOLUTION:
“It is not the propagation but the permanency of his religion
that deserves our wonder; the same pure and perfect impression which he
engraved at Makka and Madina is preserved, after the revolutions of twelve
centuries … The intellectual image of the Deity has never been degraded by any
visible idol; the honours of the prophet have never transgressed the measure of
human virtue; and his living precepts have restrained the gratitude of his
disciples within the bounds of reason and religion.”[4]
DEVOTION TO GOD AND TO RIGHTEOUSNESS
IN CONDUCT:
“The ignorance displayed by most Christians regarding the
Muslim religion is appalling … Mohammad alone, among the nations at that time,
believed in one God to the exclusion of all others. He insisted on righteousness
as the source of conduct, of filial duty, and on frequent prayers to the
Everliving God, and of respect to all other peoples, and of justice and mercy
to and moderation in all things, and to hold in great respect learning of every
kind … Most of the absurdities which Christians would have us believe to exist
in the Qur’an were never uttered by Mohammad himself, nor are they to be found
in a correct translation of the work.”[5]
CHARGE OF VOLUPTUOUSNESS REFUTED:
“By the force of his extraordinary personality, Muhammad
revolutionized life in Arabia and throughout the East. With his own hands he
smashed ancient idols and established a religion dedicated to one God. He
lifted women from the bondage in which desert custom held them and preached general
social justice.
“Muslims think it particularly ironic when Muhammad is
charged by Western writers with having established a voluptuous religion. Among
drunkards he abolished alcohol, so that even today all good Muslims are
prohibitionists. Among the lazy he ordained individual ritual prayers five
times each day. In a nation that revelled in feasting he instituted a most
rigorous day-time fast lasting as full month each year.
“Western writers have based their charges of voluptuousness
mainly on the question of women. Before Muhammad, however, men were encouraged
to take innumerable wives; he limited them to four only, and the Koran is
explicit that husbands who are unable to maintain strict equality between two
or more wives must confine themselves to one …”[6]
[1] Prof. Nathaniel Schmidt: The New International Encyclopaedia, 1916,
Vol. 16, p. 72.
[2] W. Montgomery Watt: Muhammad at Makka, Oxford 1953, p. 52.
[3] D. G. Hogarth: A History of Arabia, Oxford 1922, p. 52.
[4] Edward Gibbon and Simon Ockley: History of the Saracen Empire,
London 1870, p. 54.
[5] G. Lindsay Johnson, F.R.C.S.: The Two Worlds, Manchester, 9th
August, 1940.
[6] James A. Michener, op. cit.
to be continued . . . . .
No comments:
Post a Comment