Friday, 16 February 2018

Fasting in Islam – its basic objective



Fasting in Islam – Its Basic Objective

In Surah al-Baqarah* of the Qur’an Allah Most High addressed those who believe in that scripture as Divine revelation and informed them of the promulgation of the compulsory fast for them. The verse then disclosed that fasting was made compulsory for all those religious communities which preceded the community of Muslims who follow Prophet Muhammad (sallalahu ‘alaihi wa sallam). 

 “O you who have attained to faith! Fasting is ordained for you as it was ordained for those before you, so that you might remain conscious of Allah.”
(Quran, al-Baqara, 2:183)

Thus the compulsory fast is found in the religious life of Jews, Christians, Hindus, Buddhist and others**. The verse then ended by indicating that the objective for which the compulsory fast was promulgated is the acquisition of piety and godliness (Taqwa).

[*It is interesting to observe that after the opening chapter of the Holy Qur’an, which is itself named ‘Opening Chapter’, the next chapter is entitled the Chapter of the ‘Cow’. While the choice of this name is linked to the worship of the cow in Jewish history which is found in the chapter (Qur’an, al-Baqarah,2:67-71), it also has great significance for Hindus who consider the cow to be a holy animal. Now the choice of the cow, which performs the wondrous feat of eating grass and producing milk, as a holy animal, can be considered to have been a preliminary step in the evolution of the religious copiousness, leading eventually to the recognition of all animals as sacred. Similarly the choice of the Ganges as a holy river and Bharat as a holy land would lead eventually to the recognition of everything in this universe as holy and sacred. And this is a position which can only truly be sustained with the recognition of the world as real and as Allah’s creation. Secondly, the world and all it contains must be recognized to be functioning as a medium which leads the developed religious consciousness to Allah Most High. And this, of course, is the position of Islam itself which embraces a spiritual interpretation of the universe, a universe which overflows with the ‘Signs of Allah’ (the Ayah Allah). And the Signs of Allah Most High lead directly to Allah Himself.

** David is mentioned in the Bible as having fasted for seven days (Samuel 12:16-17). Moses fasted in order to show gratitude to Allah for the deliverance of the Israelites from Pharaoh and also for the Day of Atonement (Leviticus 16:29). Jesus Christ not only kept fasts but also commanded his followers to fast (Mathew 6:15-17, Luke 5:33-35, Acts 13:23). May Allah’s blessings be upon them all.]

The Qur’anic viewpoint therefore, is that fasting has always been an obligatory feature of the religious way of life. By instituting the compulsory fast for the religious community which followed Prophet Muhammad (peace and blessings of Allah Most High be upon him), the Qur’an simply brought religious life amongst Muslims into a state of conformity with an essential requirement of the religious way of life.

When the Qur’an went on to point out that the basic objective of fasting was the acquisition of piety and holiness (Taqwa), it followed that this must also have been the basic objective of fasting in all previous religious communities established by the thousands of Prophets and guides sent by Allah Most High to every nation and tribe (Qur’an, al-Ra’d, 13:7).

An immediate implication of this conclusion is that no religion (which claims to be founded on the One Truth) can or should condone the exploitation of the institution of fasting as a political weapon or a form of protest. And yet, in 1986, the Foreign Minister of Nicaragua, who was a Catholic priest, completed three weeks of a fast-unto-death in a protest against the policies of the government of the United States of America towards the Sandanista government in Nicaragua. In much the same way the Indian leader, Mohandas Gandhi, who was a devout Hindu and a role-model of modern reform Hinduism, used fasting as a political weapon in his struggle against British rule in India.

Piety and godliness, therefore, is the criterion with which we judge the institution of fasting as it functions, not only in the religious community established by Nabi Muhammad (sallalahu ‘alaihi wa sallam), but in all other religions and religious communities.

It is only when fasting inculcates piety and godliness that it functions in accordance with its original purpose. When it does not or, rather, no longer does, then a deviation has occurred. And it behoves the followers of the deviant religion to struggle to retrieve the original objective of fasting.

While the majority of Muslims, the world over, observe the compulsory fast of Ramadhan, we find in this age the unique phenomenon of large numbers of Muslims who do not fast. When we inquire into this phenomenon what we find is that it has emerged almost exclusively as a result of a considerable impact of modern Western civilization on such Muslims.

This is not surprising since modern Western civilization, which is largely constructed on secular and materialistic foundations, does not attach much practical value to piety and God-consciousness. As a consequence one comes across people who find it inconvenient to fast because it interferes with the efficient fulfilment of their professional obligations. Indeed a former President of Tunisia attempted to prohibit the compulsory Islamic fast because he claimed that it had a negative impact on productivity and thus constituted an obstacle to economic growth and prosperity. Others who have imprisoned themselves in the comforts and luxuries of modern sensate culture (which is a feature of Western rather than Christian civilization) find fasting to be either too rigorous or just plain inconvenient. While we shall be attempting a rational exposition of the benefits to be derived from fasting, we should also urge such Muslims to take serious note of the fact that fasting was made compulsory by Allah Most High Himself.

Any Muslim who challenges the compulsory fast and holds the view that he is under no obligation to fast would be in a state of defiance and rebellion against Allah; and since Islam connotes submission to the Will of Allah Most High, it should be obvious that such a person would not be in Islam, in the true sense of the word, and hence would not be a Muslim.

Indeed, such a Muslim places himself outside the religious way of life altogether since the Qur’an declares:

“And whosoever desires a religion other than Islam, never will it be accepted from him, and in the life to come he shall be among the lost.”
 (Qur’an, aal-’Imran, 3:85)

On the other hand, the Muslim who recognizes the obligatory nature of fasting and yet does not observe the compulsory fast because of laziness, inconvenience, or whatever reason is, in fact, committing a sin and must expect to be punished by Allah Most High for it. Similarly, since fasting was made compulsory for those religious communities which preceded the advent of Prophet Muhammad (sallalahu ‘alaihi wa sallam), and since the previous divinely-revealed laws of fasting were cancelled and abrogated and then replaced in the Qur’an with the Fast of Ramadhan:

 “Any message which, We annul or consign to oblivion We replace with a better or a similar one. Dost thou not know that Allah has the power to will anything?”
 (Qur’an, al-Baqarah, 2:106)

It follows that the followers of those religions will also incur Allah’s punishment if they, too, fail to observe the compulsory fast of Ramadhan.

To Be Continued ....




No comments:

Post a Comment