Attack On Iran Can Destabilize
Pakistan’s Pro-Israeli Regime
An Israeli attack on Iran can result in
even more ominous consequences for the Euro-Jewish State since it could provoke
an already agitated Muslim people in Pakistan to such a boiling-point of resentment
and anger as to threaten the very survival of the pro-American and pro-Israeli
Musharraf regime in Pakistan. Many Pakistanis already despise that regime.
If the present client-regime in
Pakistan were to be replaced through a military coup, or a bloody insurrection,
by a leader with credentials of opposition to American and Israeli oppression
and aggression against Muslims, Israel would certainly reverse her current ‘blind-eye’ towards Pakistan’s nuclear-weapons
capability and argue that those weapons pose a threat to her very survival. The
world would then witness yet another Judeo-Christian Euro-crusade against a
non-European Muslim people.
Already it is clear that Muslim public
opinion around the world is firmly in favor of such leaders who can resist
western and Israeli oppression and their dirty war on Islam. It was because an
opportunity presented itself for such that the last presidential election in
Iran resulted in a maverick and diplomatically immature but anti-American and
anti-Israeli Mayor of Teheran soundly defeating ex-President Rafsanjani who was
mature and diplomatically astute but whose credentials of standing up to the
oppressor were less than impressive.
It was again precisely such an
opportunity that explains the electoral victory of the Palestinian Hamas
Islamic resistance movement that has courageously resisted Israeli oppression,
over a secular Fatah with a tarnished record in the occupied Holy Land. Indeed
a western attack on Iran would almost certainly inflame Muslim public opinion
around the world to such an extent that at least some pro-American leaders and
regimes in the Muslim world will fall. Such a development would be a tremendous
loss of face for the US administration.
Attack On Iran Would Cause a
Dramatic Rise In Price Of Both Oil And Gold With Ominous Implications For The
Us Dollar
It is certain that an attack on Iran
would result in an instantaneous and dramatic rise in oil prices as well as the
price of gold. Few people seem to realize that when the price of gold ‘goes up’ it actually amounts to the value of
the US dollar ‘going down’. In September 1971 the US government, having solemnly pledged
its word, reneged and scrapped the Breton Woods Accord. Britain had acted in
September 1971 in accordance with her rights under the Breton Woods Accord in demanding
that the US government redeem for gold (at $35 per ounce of gold) a few billion
dollars of British-held US dollars. USA was legally obliged to do so under
international law, but did not have the gold to redeem all the dollars it had printed
and put in circulation both domestically and overseas. That was fraudulent. It
could have led to war. But all that happened was that US simply broke her word,
reneged from her treaty obligations and scrapped the Breton Woods Accord.
The value of the US dollar has been
generally based since then on market demand around the world. Specifically, however,
the US dollar has kept its strength because of imperial America’s control over
its oil-exporting client-states, insisting that the dollar must be the currency
used for the purchase of oil.
USA was devious enough to get the world
to accept that it could take any amount of paper and make money with it, and so
long as mankind accepted that paper-money, and there was demand for it, USA did
not have to worry about where it would find the money to pay for imports,
goods, services, etc. It would simply print the paper. But USA ensured that
there would be a substantial and significant demand for US paper dollars by
imposing upon oil exporting countries the obligation to sell their oil for that
US paper-money. The result was that the demand for US dollars remained forever
strong, indeed stronger by far than the demand for any other paper money.
But war on Iran would certainly disrupt
oil and gas exports from that country and could, conceivably, also result in a
shutdown of the strategic Straits of Hormuz through which tankers laden with Gulf
oil must pass to get to the open seas.
“If Europe does not act wisely with the Iranian nuclear portfolio
and it is referred to the U.N. Security Council and economic or air travel restrictions
are imposed unjustly, we have the power to halt oil supply to the last drop from
the shores of the Persian Gulf via the Straits of Hormuz,” said Mohammed-Nabi Rudaki, deputy
chairman of the Iranian parliament’s National Security and Foreign Policy
Commission.
Twenty-five to forty percent of the
world’s oil trade passes through the Straits of Hormuz, which connects the
Persian Gulf to the Indian Ocean. If Iran were to carry out such a threat,
other big oil producers in the region, such as the United Arab Emirates and
Kuwait, would be unable to export oil to Japan, China and the rest of the
world.
Oil prices could conceivably increase
to $200 a barrel or more, and as the price of gold also escalates as it did in
January 1980 ($850 an oz.) the US dollar would so lose value as to become a
very significant liability. If some Central Banks and large corporations
respond to the falling value of the dollar by turning away from the US dollar
in search of a more stable currency which could store value with greater
reliability, and if the proposed Iranian oil bourse succeeds in offering an alternative
to the dollar for the purchase of oil, this would have disastrous consequences
for the dollar. If the US dollar loses its present status as the international
currency, such a collapse would bring down with it all the paper money in the world.
It would also mark the end of the era of American dominance over the rest of
the world as the ruling state. Such would be an entirely positive development
for an Israel that is just biding its time to replace USA as the third and last
ruling state in history.
Israeli Attack On Iran Would Be A
Stab In The Back For U.S Forces In Iraq And Afghanistan But Would Result In Unprecedented
Opportunity For Israel
An Israeli attack on Iran and a western
occupation of Iran’s oil belt would provoke an instantaneous and dramatic
increase in the size and power of the armed Muslim resistance to US occupation
of Iraq and Afghanistan. Even more ominously, both Sunni and Shia Muslims would
now jointly wage the armed struggle to liberate these territories from US
occupation. Anti-war public opinion in USA would force a repetition of the US
withdrawal from Vietnam. In addition US troops in places such as Pakistan,
Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Turkey and so many other Muslim countries would either
have to withdraw or go into hiding. This would imply both military and
political disaster for USA and would precipitate her rapid decline as the
ruling state in the world. A nuclear attack on Iran would also expose US troops
in Iraq to dangerous nuclear radio-active fallout.
But it would also present to the world
a carefully engineered spectacle of an Israel bereft of US protective security,
hemmed in by the so-called rising tide of militant Islam, and threatened with
destruction. Thus the necessary conditions would have been cleverly and
deliberately created for Israel to claim a causus bellum that would justify a war that would deliver, in turn, a
dramatic territorial expansion (“from the river of Egypt to the great river – the river
Euphrates”).
Israel would seize control of the Suez Canal as well as all the oil and gas
resources in the Persian Gulf while finally embracing the Biblical frontiers of
Holy Israel.
In conclusion, this is no conspiracy
theory but, rather, the truth about a plan that continues to be confirmed as
events unfold in the world. Nor is this essay anti-Jewish. There are Jews who
oppose the wickedness of the Euro-Jewish State of Israel. There are Jews who
found refuge and security in the Muslim world and lived peacefully with Muslims
with honor, respect and religious freedom for more than a thousand years until
they were deceived into leaving their homeland and to take up residence in the
imposter State of Israel. There are Jews who do not wage war on Islam, nor
support those who do so. Not only can such Jews be friends of Muslims, they can
also be our allies.
